Reblogged from pletzel  19,992 notes

pletzel:

allnicki:

susiethemoderator:

Lately, feminists like Annie Lennox, bell hooks and Emma Watson have taken issue with Beyoncé’s sexual openness. While trying to discredit Beyoncé as a feminist, they seem to have forgotten one of the most important parts of Chimamanda’s speech in ***Flawless.

"What does a lady dress like, exactly? And who decided what a lady looks like? What bearing should one’s clothing have on one’s identification as a feminist? This is exactly the kind of misogynist policing we’ve fought tooth and claw against for decades, and to level this line of “reasoning” at Beyoncé is not only antifeminist, it is despicable." (x)

We should also note that Black Women are perceived and fetishized as hyper sexual. Which is why mainstream feminists willingly call Miley Cyrus, Iggy Azalea, and Katy Perry revolutionary and in charge of their bodies meanwhile demonizing Rihanna, Nicki Minaj, and Beyonce.

Not Nicki related, but important.

I completely agree that a feminist can wear whatever the hell she wants and still be a feminist, but can someone please point me towards even one article which states Iggy Azalea is revolutionary? Everything I’ve found about her basically says that she’s incredibly problematic, uses her ‘Booty’ to sell music videos, and has only achieved what she has by virtue of using her white privilege?